STOWRIG

Tight means two different boundaries, and only one is a measurement

The question

The verdict says Tight and the bag still clears. Which is it?

Worked from the planner by stowrig-content-pipeline (claude-opus-5)

A verdict of Tight reads like a warning about millimetres, and on most dimensions that is what it is. On one dimension it is not. The engine judges every clearance against a threshold, and the threshold is not the same number everywhere — so a gap can be wider than the band governing the rest of the bike and still come back Tight.

15 mmthe tyre gap the engine insists on, however well the frame was measured

Each dimension is held to the larger of two numbers: how well the frame was measured, and how much room that dimension needs in use. On all three reference frames the measurement tolerance is 8 mm, and for every dimension but one it is the larger of the two, so it is the one that decides. The tyre gap is the exception. It carries the margin above, which is larger, so that is what the tyre gap is held to instead.

Two seat packs on the same frame, one verdict apart

Both on the medium reference frame, The Mule. The figure beside each clearance is the threshold that dimension was judged against.
Seat packExposed seatpostTyre clearanceVerdict
11000 ml20 mm, against 8 mm31 mm, against 15 mmFits
14000 ml30 mm, against 8 mm12 mm, against 15 mmTight

The pack that comes back Tight has more room at the seatpost than the one that fits. What it has less of is tyre clearance, and that is the only gap in the pair sitting inside the threshold applied to it — while still being wider than the band every other dimension on the bike is held to. Measured anywhere else, that gap would have cleared.

Everywhere else, Tight means what it looks like

Every Tight verdict decided by the measurement tolerance rather than the tyre margin. The handlebar and fork bags return the same clearance on all three reference frames; the two frame bags are on the medium and large, the small frame having refused both outright.
BagThe dimension that decided itClearanceJudged against
Handlebar, 15000 mlto the headlight bracket2 mm8 mm
Frame bag, 6500 mlclearance at the down-tube boss3 mm8 mm
Frame bag, 7000 mlthigh line4 mm8 mm
Fork or cargo, 3000 mlof strap purchase on a rigid fork leg6 mm8 mm

Where a verdict carries no millimetres at all

Some bags clear every dimension the ruleset measures, and the engine still names something as limiting: in-frame volume, with no clearance recorded behind it. The 5500 ml frame bag reads that way on all three reference frames, and on the large frame the 18000 ml seat pack and the 4000 ml fork bag do too. Those are verdicts of Fits with no margin to report, because nothing the sweep measured came near a threshold.

What this cannot tell you

Whether Tight will bother you. The threshold behind most of these verdicts is a measurement tolerance, which describes how well a frame was measured rather than how a bag will sit on it — so Tight on a carefully measured frame and Tight on a rough one are the same word about different situations. All three reference frames carry the same tolerance, so nothing above shows what a worse measurement would do to the verdicts. The refusals are absent on purpose: a blocking finding records no clearance, so a bag the engine rejects has no margin to appear here with, and which bags those are is a different sweep. A reference frame is also not your frame. And nothing here was ridden or loaded; every figure is a rule applied to a measurement.

Every claim above, and how it is known

Other notes worked the same way

Every figure here came out of the same rules that answer the interview, so it moves when they do. Yours differ wherever your answers differ.

Plan the ride →